I will never forget sitting with my Dad watching the morning news on our annual ski trip when word broke that Saddam Hussein had been found in a fox hole. My Dad, the thinking man that he is, posed a question to me that made me have a profound realization about how I feel about a number of heavy topics: "If you found yourself there, the only person to encounter Saddam Hussein, and you had a gun and the chance to do to him what he had done to countless others, would you shoot him?"
I'm not going to say what my answer was, because that's not the point of the post, but I was reminded of that question when I read this post by Heather Armstrong a couple of days ago, posing her own hypothetical question: "Let's say you're given the opportunity to donate some money to a desperate family who would use it to feed their children, but were only able to do so if you donated the same amount of money to someone you knew would use it to buy crack. Would you do it?"
Take a few minutes to chew on either or both of those questions. Does that tell you something about yourself?
If you're curious as to why Heather was asking, she explains and I think everyone should read, not because I'm trying to teach a lesson in humanitarianism but because I think it's a beautifully written post demonstrating how something so simple can affect someone so profoundly.
(Cheers to Dooce)
3 comments:
MG,
I would have humiliated and tortured Saddam Hussein, no question. Same with Osama bin Laden. This is assuming I had a gun and no one on his side to interfere.
As for the second question, yes. I would donate the money. I think the pros outweigh the cons.
Wow, the post about the rose, etc. really got to me.
I don't know that I could do anything in the Saddam Hussein situation. I don't think there's any part of me that has the ability to purposely harm another person. Maybe if it were a kill or be killed situation . . . you know, really not pleasant to think about. :)
I do think I'd give money to the family who needed to feed their children no matter the consequence on the flip side -- that person is making a choice and it's their choice. I wouldn't be happy about it, but kids getting food is more important.
I read that yesterday too.
I would donate money.
Post a Comment